Page 12 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 12
What Do We Know about the World?
2.2. Insults as Unparliamentary Language 229
3. Methodology 230
3.2. Corpus 230
3.3. Criteria 231
3.4. Procedure 231
4. Results and Discussion 232
4.1.DirectInsultingStrategies:(Un)parliamentaryPolarization 232
4.1.1. diachronic aspect of (un)parliamentary 235
polarization
4.2. (Un)parliamentary Mitigation Strategies in the Croatian
Parliament 237
4.2.1. attribution transfer strategy 238
4.2.2. the formulation of insults as questions rather 239
than as statements
4.2.3. juxtaposition of opposite notions: democracy, 241
morality vs. communism, corruption, lying
4.3. In-Group Identity and Inter-Group Dissent 242
5. Conclusion 243
Acknowledgements 244
References 244
III. legal Discourse 249
Taking Judges Seriously: Argumentation and Rhetoric 251
in Legal Decisions
■ Maurizio Manzin, Research Centre on Legal Methodology (CERMEG),
University of Trento
1. Logic and the Law in the Main Italian Legal Sources 251
2. The Modern Formalistic Heritage 252
3. A Classical Meaning of Logic 254
4. The Legal Syllogism 255
5. Some Problems Relating to the Syllogistic Model 256
6. Scientific Contexts and Legal Ones 258
7. Rhetoric and the Law 259
8. A Logical Method for Legal Reasoning 260
2.2. Insults as Unparliamentary Language 229
3. Methodology 230
3.2. Corpus 230
3.3. Criteria 231
3.4. Procedure 231
4. Results and Discussion 232
4.1.DirectInsultingStrategies:(Un)parliamentaryPolarization 232
4.1.1. diachronic aspect of (un)parliamentary 235
polarization
4.2. (Un)parliamentary Mitigation Strategies in the Croatian
Parliament 237
4.2.1. attribution transfer strategy 238
4.2.2. the formulation of insults as questions rather 239
than as statements
4.2.3. juxtaposition of opposite notions: democracy, 241
morality vs. communism, corruption, lying
4.3. In-Group Identity and Inter-Group Dissent 242
5. Conclusion 243
Acknowledgements 244
References 244
III. legal Discourse 249
Taking Judges Seriously: Argumentation and Rhetoric 251
in Legal Decisions
■ Maurizio Manzin, Research Centre on Legal Methodology (CERMEG),
University of Trento
1. Logic and the Law in the Main Italian Legal Sources 251
2. The Modern Formalistic Heritage 252
3. A Classical Meaning of Logic 254
4. The Legal Syllogism 255
5. Some Problems Relating to the Syllogistic Model 256
6. Scientific Contexts and Legal Ones 258
7. Rhetoric and the Law 259
8. A Logical Method for Legal Reasoning 260
